Mahkamah drag child access for over 2 years

389 Views  ⚫  Asked 1 Year Ago
asked on Jun 21, 2017 at 20:35
by   Berifee
I filed in a notice to gain access to my kid around 2015, the other party lawyer then drag the matter with excuses like the kid don't want to see me, I must pay more money and etc.

The shocking thing is the court entertain those excuses for years and continue to drag the matter and allow such noble request for child access to be challenge for such a long time.

Is there anyway I can complain this judge professionalism for allowing such matter to drag for so long together with the opponent lawyer?
0 had this question
Me Too
0 favorites
[ share ]
28 Answers
« Previous   1   2   3   Next »  Last »

answered on Jun 24, 2017 at 19:11
by   jeff005
edited Jun 24, 2017 at 20:55
by   jeff005
I am just trying to help only.

My own personal experiences.
I Fight for Joint Custody of the only son. She applied for FULL CUSTODY with very limited visitational (NOT ACCESS) rights for me.
I fought alone 2 Family High Court cases against 3 sets of lawyers (employed my rich ex wife) because I have NO MONEY..!! I faced a High Court Judge 5-6 times, fight for my rights as a parent without lawyer representation. 
8 Lawyers tells me I would lose for sure.
The No.9 lawyer says can fight 50%/50%

I came to this forum, good samaritans like vkpc, notalawyer, kiki and others helped me with court procedures and legal jargon and I faced the High Court Judge face to face. I manage to set aside the applications. If not I would have lost and have to bear my ex wife lawyers fees of at least 50K. Both Judges listened to my valuable points.

Why you want to send a parent to jail
The thought of being send to jail for committal proceedings would scare any offensive parent. In itself, by going to jail for repeating offences, the FULL CUSTODY would go to the other party. 

In the very words of the High Court Judge spoken to me, my ex wife and her two sets of lawyers..
I quote..

" The whole case is over. Whoever breaks this Perintah, I would not hesitate to allow committal proceedings and sent the offending party to JAIL "

It is how you fight for your own rights not only just through the filings of AFFIDAVITS by own lawyers.
Justice do Prevails
0 found this helpful

answered on Jun 24, 2017 at 19:27
by   vkpc
Why you want to send a parent to jail when there's better other way to compel the access?
Actually the best way to compel obedience to a Court Order is a threat of jail.
There is no better way.

Why the judge not be blame when access have been applied and the judge just need to allow the access application instead of dragging with the other party who give lame excuses?
Judge already allow the access by giving the Court Order.
It is up to you to enforce that order with Committal Proceedings.
What else do you expect the Judge to do, call up the order party with the mobile phone?
You are the one giving lame excuses for not enforcing the order.
0 found this helpful

answered on Jun 24, 2017 at 19:48
by   Berifee
edited Jun 24, 2017 at 19:53
by   Berifee
I can show you numerous cases committal proceeding thrown out again and again. Also is not about vengeance. Why want to create hatred everywhere?

I applied for access, so the judge need to just turunkan perintah. What so hard? Simple...

This is application for ACCESS, not CUSTODY. Please think, whatever excuse by me or the opponent, such noble request should be RESPECTED.

Simple right and wrong also cannot comprehend, want to be judge/lawyer?? Please...
0 found this helpful

answered on Jun 24, 2017 at 20:28
by   vkpc
1. I applied for access, so the judge need to just turunkan perintah. What so hard?
2. Already got Perintah for child access but not obeyed,

You are contradicting yourself.
Nobody is going to help you if you keep on talking like this.
0 found this helpful

answered on Jun 24, 2017 at 20:46
by   Berifee
Perintah already got, but I applied again, so just grant the application instead of dragging the matter.

What so contradicting?

There's nothing wrong how I talk, whatever I said is base on strong reason/merit.

I just need people like you and Jeff (Jeff is still ok but especially you) to just be rightful instead of trying to justify wrong from right.

You should repent and stop attempting to confuse society and your clients especially.

Justice will not prevail if we got people like vkpc and his small gang.

Please reply with merit and reason, otherwise do not bother to. Neither me need help from people like you.
0 found this helpful

answered on Jun 24, 2017 at 22:51
by   LowyerBorak
If there is no longer love, there is no hatred
If there is no hatred, there is no longer love
Let the battle start and end at the Courts

The lawyers (both sides) above are extremely good and resourceful
They managed to circumvent around the court procedures thus making more monies from court appearances as well as it appears to be a "tough battle", raking in more fees.
They also hoodwinked all parties and then charge higher fees for a simple application like this one as any normal homo sapien can comprehend. Malaysia Bolih....
0 found this helpful

answered on Jun 25, 2017 at 00:22
by   jebat
Funny how the lawyer managed to convince him to apply for the same thing twice.
Must be a genius lawyer.
0 found this helpful

answered on Jun 25, 2017 at 01:06
by   Berifee
Using court process as excuse to not allow child access is definitely shameful and a mere excuse.

By right, such right as child access should have been respected by all parties and not be drag for so long or more so be allowed to be challenge up to the court.

Simple ethical value also cannot understand....
0 found this helpful

answered on Jun 25, 2017 at 02:27
by   vanessa wong
If the one party is alleged to a spouse beater, child abuser or did not pay alimony or child support, or did not obey a Court Order, it is likely that he/she will be denied access to the child.
0 found this helpful

answered on Jun 25, 2017 at 02:55
by   NoraKunLowyar2b
Jebat, betul ke ni kali yg kedua? No wunder CoA tendang balik ni applikasi..!! Adakah loyar2 tidak faham apanya "access" dan "visitational" rights dlm Perintah tersebut?
Ada org pernah masuk menghisapi udara, melawat jailbirds? Tu lah visitational rights under control environment.

Access to a child is every parent's rights, but, the rights can been denied depending on the deeds conducted prior to the divorce which is a major factor to the breakdown of any marriage.

Simple ethical value also cannot understand....
Respect Court Procedures and/or Orders, the rights of any Parent will be duly reciprocated.
0 found this helpful

« Previous   1   2   3   Next »  Last »

Your Answer

By posting your answer, you agree to the privacy policy, cookie policy and terms of service.