Advertisement

Fair justice in Malaysia

281 Views  ⚫  Asked 1 Year Ago
asked on Oct 6, 2016 at 02:40
by   Srewed
Company X has 2 directors, one managing and one investing director (husband and wife)
The managing director does not reveal how the company is doing to the investing director
Husband and wife break up 2011.
In 2012 the investing director visit the company but is not let in by the staff (11 staff)
Managing director takes monies from clients and never returns to the business. This happened in 2012 May. Since the managing director left there was no business conducted till now.  In 2013 the managing director is replaced.
The clients complained with the court.
The prosecutor says now the investment director has to pay for the monies taken by the managing director, because in 2016 the name of the managing director is not there anymore.
The managing director was the only one to have access to the company banking account(via company resolution).
The managing director took the monies in 2012 and emptied the company bank account.
The investment director is the only director summed to court to stand trial for the misconduct by the managing director.

Fair justice?
0 had this question
Me Too
0 favorites
Favorite
[ share ]
1 Answers

answered on Oct 6, 2016 at 02:44
by   vkpc
The investment director is the only director summed to court to stand trial for the misconduct by the managing director.
Is it a criminal case or a civil lawsuit?
0 found this helpful
Helpful

Your Answer





By posting your answer, you agree to the privacy policy and terms of service.